Free delivery within the UK for orders over £45 🚚
TL;DR
- We do not hold an organic certification, and we looked into it seriously before deciding against it.
- The cost and the bureaucracy involved did not make sense for our farm, and we were not willing to pass that cost on to the price of the bottle.
- We still farm without pesticides or synthetic fertilisers. We just don’t pay for a stamp that proves it.
- Local shepherds graze their sheep and goats on our land, a generations-old arrangement that naturally fertilises the soil and keeps the vegetation in check.
- Every harvest, we send our oil to TÜV AUSTRIA for independent testing, proving the absence of pesticide residue and other contaminants directly, rather than certifying the farming process that led to it.
- The label is not the only way to prove trust. Transparency, history, and a willingness to answer questions directly matter more to us.
People sometimes ask why a five-generation Greek olive estate, one that farms without pesticides and without synthetic fertiliser, does not carry an organic certification on the bottle. It is a fair question, and the honest answer is more interesting than “we never bothered.”
We did bother. We looked into it properly, more than once. And each time, we made the same decision: it was not worth doing.
Here is why.
We Did Look Into It
This is not a case of never considering organic certification. At different points, we explored what conversion would actually involve, and we got far enough into the process to understand the real costs, both financial and administrative, before deciding it was not the right path for us.
What we found was consistent with what small producers across the olive oil world report. The certification process is genuinely difficult for an operation our size, and it gets harder, not easier, the smaller you are.
A cost comparison study of organic versus conventional olive production in Greece confirms what we encountered directly: Greece’s olive oil sector struggles with profitability when competing against larger producers like Italy and Spain, and organic conversion adds a further layer of cost on top of an already thin margin. For a small family estate, that additional cost does not disappear. It has to go somewhere, and the only place it can go is the price of the bottle.
We were not willing to do that.
The Real Cost of the Label
Organic certification sounds simple from the outside. In practice, it is a lengthy and expensive process, and the numbers are not small.
Across the EU, the conversion period to organic status typically takes between one and three years depending on the crop, and for perennial crops like olive orchards, it usually sits at the longer end of that range. During the entire conversion period, a farm must follow organic methods without being able to sell anything as organic, which means absorbing the cost of organic practices while still receiving conventional prices. A piece on the economics of organic farming in the EU described this clearly: for a farm in a lower-income country, the cost of certification in the first year alone can exceed 50% of annual income, and during the transition years a farmer sees none of the benefit of organic pricing while often dealing with lower yields.
Even once certified, the costs do not stop. Annual inspections, ongoing paperwork, and renewal fees are a permanent fixture of maintaining the label, not a one-time hurdle. One small US farm that chose to stay uncertified summed up the ongoing burden well: the certification process requires extensive yearly documentation including soil tests, projected yields, and field notes, with farmers advised to set aside time every single day just to keep the paperwork current. The same piece noted that average annual certification costs run around $1,000 a year, a figure that would meaningfully affect a small farm’s bottom line if absorbed rather than passed on.
This pattern repeats everywhere small organic-method farms are asked about certification. A former organic retail buyer who later worked directly with small growers admitted that once he saw the certification process from the inside, the experience left him questioning the entire system: handling the administrative side of organic certification as a wholesaler revealed extensive record-keeping requirements for every single thing that came in and went out of the operation, and the certifying body seemed more focused on finding errors to penalise than on supporting producers.
We read accounts like these, and they matched our own experience closely. The certification exists to build trust between farmers and consumers, and that is a genuinely good goal. But for a farm of our size, the financial and administrative weight of achieving it did not match the benefit, especially when we were already farming the way the certification exists to verify.
Greece Has the Same Problem, At National Scale
This is not just our experience. It is a structural issue across Greek and EU smallholder agriculture.
Greece now has one of the higher shares of organically farmed land in the EU, with organic farming accounting for 17.2% of the country’s total agricultural area and over 80,000 registered organic farmers, putting it above the EU average. But the same report is candid about what stands in the way of further growth, identifying the high cost of organic certification and limited access to financial and technical resources for small-scale farmers as the central barriers the country still needs to solve.
In other words, the cost problem we encountered on our own land is the same cost problem holding back an entire national sector. We are not an outlier. We are a fairly typical example of what happens when a small producer does the maths.
What We Actually Do Instead
Choosing not to certify is not the same as choosing not to farm responsibly. We still avoid pesticides and synthetic fertilisers. We just don’t pay an external body to confirm it every year.
One of the practices we are proudest of, and one that has nothing to do with certification at all, is older than any organic label that exists today. For generations, we have allowed local shepherds to graze their sheep and goats across our land. It is a simple, mutually beneficial arrangement that has carried on for as long as anyone in the family can remember. The animals keep the undergrowth and weeds under control between the trees, and their manure returns nutrients directly to the soil, naturally and continuously, with no input we have to buy or apply ourselves.
It is not branded as an ecological strategy. It is simply how the land has always been managed here, and it works. The shepherds benefit from the grazing land, we benefit from the soil health and weed control, and the trees benefit from a steady, natural source of fertility that has nothing synthetic in it at any point.
This is, in a sense, the entire argument of this post in miniature. The practice does exactly what organic certification is designed to verify. It has just never needed a certificate to prove it.
We do, however, believe in proof where it actually matters most to you, the person drinking the oil. Every harvest, we send our oil to TÜV AUSTRIA, one of the most respected independent testing laboratories in Europe, for a comprehensive screen for pesticide residues and other non-organic contaminants. This is not a certification that tells you how we farmed. It is a direct laboratory test that tells you what is, and is not, in the bottle.
The distinction matters. Organic certification verifies a process: the methods, the paperwork, the inputs used across the season. A TÜV AUSTRIA residue test verifies an outcome: the actual chemical composition of the oil you are about to use. We would rather spend our budget proving the result directly than paying for a label that certifies the process leading to it. For us, that is the more honest and more useful kind of proof.
Why We’re Comfortable Saying This Out Loud
Some producers in our position might be tempted to imply organic status without saying it directly, or to lean on vague language that lets the consumer assume more than is technically true. We would rather not do that.
We don’t carry the certification. We use traditional, low-intervention methods that predate the entire organic movement by generations, and we back that up with independent TÜV AUSTRIA residue testing every single harvest. If you want to know exactly what we do and do not do on the land, ask us. We will tell you plainly, the same way we have just told you here.
If you are curious about the other side of how we think about quality and proof, our post on how we test and certify every harvest explains the lab analysis we do invest in, including the TÜV AUSTRIA testing, because that is testing we consider genuinely worth the cost. And if you want to taste what five generations of this kind of farming actually produces, you can browse the current harvest in our shop.
The Bottom Line
We looked at organic certification seriously, more than once, and walked away both times for the same reason: the cost and the bureaucracy did not justify themselves for a farm our size, and we were not willing to push that cost onto the price of the bottle.
We still farm the way the certification exists to verify. No pesticides, no synthetic fertiliser, and a generations-old grazing arrangement with local shepherds that fertilises the soil for free. What we do pay for is independent TÜV AUSTRIA testing every harvest, proving directly that the oil in your bottle is free of pesticide residue and other contaminants. We just do not think a process label is the only way to prove any of that to you. Ask us anything, and we will show you the test results behind it.


